Answer:
Felisha's argument is sound, as it has a valid structure, true premises, and is a sound argument. Firstly, it has a valid structure as it follows the central premise of her statement--that the Cowboys are going to win the Super Bowl--and then provides supporting reasons for why this should occur.
This week, I had an argument with my friend about whether or not pineapple belongs on pizza. I argued that it does, and he argued that it doesn't. We went back and forth for a while, and neither of us could convince the other. In the end, we agreed to disagree.
I think I succeeded in my argument because I was able to present a strong case for why pineapple belongs on pizza. I pointed out that pineapple is a sweet fruit, and that sweetness pairs well with the savory flavors of pizza. I also said that pineapple adds a bit of texture and juiciness to pizza, which can make it more enjoyable to eat.
However, I also think that my friend succeeded in his argument. He pointed out that pineapple is a very different flavor from the other toppings that are typically used on pizza. He also said that pineapple can sometimes make pizza too sweet, and that it can also make the pizza soggy.
In the end, I think that both of us made valid points. However, I think that my argument was more persuasive because I was able to focus on the positive aspects of pineapple on pizza.
This argument taught me a lot about how to have a successful argument. I learned that it is important to be able to present a strong case for your argument. It is also important to be able to listen to the other person's argument and to respect their point of view. Finally, it is important to be willing to compromise.
please mark me as a brillianist..
